Bob Forsyth – To bid or not to bid, that is the question

 
Paul Atherton – Enabling Technology to Drive Commercial Benefit In his first blog Paul Atherton, Chief Sales & Marketing Officer at Kings Security discusses what is possible for security in integrating new innovative technologies. Read on »
Bob Forsyth – Cloud Technology, trajectory of the future In his latest blog for Infologue Bob Forsyth, Chief Executive Officer at Kings Security writes about Cloud Technology and its prospective applications for the security sector.  Read on »
Churchill Services Group announces the launch of its new rebranded security division Churchill Services Group has today announced the launch of its new rebranded security division – ‘Amulet’. Read on »
Sunday, 21 October 2018

Bob Forsyth – To bid or not to bid, that is the question

Bob Forsyth - Managing Director of MITIE Total Security Management

Bob Forsyth - Managing Director of MITIE Total Security Management

In his latest blog for Infologue.com, Bob Forsyth, Managing Director of MITIE Total Security Management discusses when to bid for contracts. Bob writes: “In a time when commoditisation is still blighting our industry, the bid/no bid decision is more important than ever. Recently, I have seen cases where companies are bidding at a loss or just breaking even in order to secure a contract.

“This approach is not sustainable in the longer term. It’s commercial suicide. I have found myself asking what is driving this insanity. If buyers insist on focusing on price, is it worth the time and resource of submitting a bid?

“I was very interested to read Stuart Lodge’s – CEO Lodge Service – recent post on the problem. He highlighted that in price-driven sectors, standards will flat line and ultimately damage our industry. I agree that in order to make our industry sustainable, we (as responsible and professional security providers) must not enter into practices that facilitate this damage.

“Facilities management is a low margin sector. Security personnel wages total 90% of contracts’ charge rate. This can only be exacerbated by a shrinking labour market. Low margin contracts, coupled with longer payment terms, could doom companies’ ability to viably trade in the longer term.

“My view has not changed in that margin is not relevant, price is. But, this demands a buying behaviour that understands value and has a flexible approach on service.

“It is this approach that is leading security providers to consider no-bidding for large contracts. The perceived value of security is encouraging commoditisation, causing an unsustainable lack of innovation.

“There is no doubt that some sectors feature higher on the no bid ratio than others. I don’t see this changing in the near future.

“This will inevitably mean smarter ways of working. Suppliers may avoid bidding for contracts within sectors that are inflexible in their approach to security. There are still some sectors that seem reluctant to embrace the integration of technology.

“We have stopped bidding for these contracts, a sensible move given the impossible situation created by reduced budgets and a continued focus on pure manpower specifications. Some may say this is a brave move; surely we should always pursue new business opportunities? We say not if the end result is a poor service and poor experience for the customer and our colleagues at the front end.”

As Shakespeare said once:

“this above all: to thine own self be true.”

Mitie Website

Opinions expressed by contributors and commentators do not necessarily reflect the views of Infologue.com or Interconnective Limited.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Interconnective Security Products