GOOD NEWS ABOUT TUPE FOR A CHANGE!

 
Paul Atherton – Enabling Technology to Drive Commercial Benefit In his first blog Paul Atherton, Chief Sales & Marketing Officer at Kings Security discusses what is possible for the security sector in integrating new innovative technologies. Read on »
Bob Forsyth – Cloud Technology, trajectory of the future In his latest blog for Infologue Bob Forsyth, Chief Executive Officer at Kings Security writes about Cloud Technology and its prospective applications for the security sector.  Read on »
Churchill Services Group announces the launch of its new rebranded security division Churchill Services Group has today announced the launch of its new rebranded security division – ‘Amulet’. Read on »
Thursday, 16 August 2018

GOOD NEWS ABOUT TUPE FOR A CHANGE!

A real headache caused by TUPE has gone away writes employment lawyer Paul Housego of Beers LLP who specialise in employment law in the outsourced services sector.  Many public bodies have outsourced security work to outside firms – and of course these are tupe transfers so the contract win comes complete with guards.

These guards often have contracts of employment with mechanisms for setting pay and conditions, so that salaries are not negotiated individually but collectively in a bargaining process for many workers. The trouble is that English law has taken a ‘dynamic’ view of such contracts of employment.  This means a tupe transfer employee’s contract comes complete with the right to have pay increases decided by other people somewhere else.  You don’t have any say in it.

Obviously this is a headache.  Readers will know better than I that this is an administrative nightmare; you have to use pay review dates not set by you, and you have to go and find out what terms have changed.  Financially it is impossible to know what return will be coming from a contract when you have no control over the major cost constituent – pay. After some uncertainty the Employment Appeal Tribunal decided in January 2009 that this was the law – the case is – Alemo-Herron –v- Parkwood Leisure Ltd. But the employers appealed.  It took a whole year for the appeal to be concluded – and the report of it is now available. The Court of Appeal decided that a European Court of Justice decision (Werhof –v- Freeway Traffic Systems GmbH, in 2006) had not been taken into account by the Employment Appeal Tribunal, and overturned their decision. So now the Court of Appeal has decided that the law is that this type of contract is a ‘static’ contract of employment.

Reading the case is not recommended!  It would be easier to understand how to make a moon rocket.  But the conclusion is very easy to grasp.  When such a employee transfers to you his or her terms and conditions are as if preserved in aspic at that point.  That snapshot is what they came with.  From that date on they do not have pay rates and conditions variable by outside bodies. Pay and conditions are a matter – solely – for you and them. Those of you with lawyers like me to advise you will probably know of this already, – and those without might wish to find one – but for smaller companies struggling with the burden of this financially and administratively who have not heard of this, it is unmitigated good news.  Any reader who would like a more lawyerly exposition than this can obtain it without charge by contacting me.

BEERS LLP Website


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Interconnective Security Products