Paul Housego – Qualifying period for unfair dismissal

ph_tie_T42 Paul Harvey – It all begins with a single thought…. Paul Harvey, Board Director at Ultimate Security, discusses his thoughts on the security industry in his latest blog for Read on »
South West Water Image 2 Infologue Case Study – Securitas – Securitas and South West Water has introduced four case studies annually to share best practice in the security industry. The second case study is presented by Securitas. Read on »
Dave Whittle Dave Whittle – Raising the alarm: Businesses need to prioritise the support offered to lone workers Dave Whittle, CEO at Positive Response, discusses lone workers in his latest blog for Read on »
Saturday, 30 April 2016

Paul Housego – Qualifying period for unfair dismissal

Paul Housego - Labour Lawyer of Beers Solicitors

Paul Housego - Labour Lawyer of Beers Solicitors

Most people will have heard that employees will have to work 2 years before they can make a claim to an employment tribunal that they have been unfairly dismissed, writes Workplace contributor and labour lawyer of Beers Solicitors, Paul Housego.

But do be careful. It is never as simple as a headline. I hope most people have checked out what the new regulations actually say. I can put the important part really simply. FOR THOSE THAT START WORK AFTER APRIL 2012 THE QUALIFYING PERIOD IS 2 YEARS.

The trap for the unwary leaps out when you stop and think for a moment. If someone starts in March 2012, and is dismissed after April 2013, then even though the new rule will have been in a year, that person will qualify to bring an unfair dismissal claim.

It will not be possible to have a simple rule that 2 years qualifying period applies to all until April 2014. Until then it will be necessary to check an employee’s start date to see whether there is a risk of an unfair dismissal claim.

Of course it is sensible to review every employee before the qualifying period has been worked, and this change may be helpful to everyone. Employers will be able to give employees more opportunity to improve rather than exiting them before the year runs out.

Housego’s law of unintended consequences will apply, as is it is of universal application! If people can’t claim unfair dismissal they will try to claim something else which doesn’t need a qualifying period. Some form of discrimination, or public interest disclosure, or being dismissed for asserting a statutory right, or for a health and safety reason, or for a reason related to trade union activity. Since this is quite a long list, and since discrimination now includes associative discrimination, there is a lot of scope for claiming. Such claims can be very time consuming and expensive to defend, and of course there is no limit on awards.

So, just a reminder of the standard caution, before you take action against any employee just run through the risk factors for such claims, and ensure that if they are present that you can show that in no sense whatsoever (it is a high hurdle for employers) can a protected characteristic be thought to be behind the action you are to take.”

Beers LLP Website

Leave a Reply

Interconnective Security Products