Peter Webster – A back door… or a trap door?

 
Peter Webster - Chief Executive of Corps Security Peter Webster – It’s time to cast a light in the dark corners of subcontracting Peter Webster, chief executive of Corps Security, a regular Infologue.com blogger, discusses subcontracting in his latest blog.  Read on »
Mitie Plc. Jason Towse
Credit: Ed Robinson/OneRedEye Jason Towse, MD for Mitie’s security management business, reviews the security industry for the third quarter of the year Jason Towse reviews the security industry in his role as Managing Director for Mitie’s security business.  Read on »
Dave Whittle - CEO at Positive Response Dave Whittle – Prioritising staff and customer safety during the Black Friday sales Dave Whittle, CEO at Positive Response, discusses the Black Friday sales in his latest blog for Infologue.com.  Read on »
Monday, 5 December 2016

Peter Webster – A back door… or a trap door?

Peter Webster – Chief Executive of Corps Security

Peter Webster, chief executive of Corps Security, a regular Infologue.com blogger, discusses Apple and the FBI in his latest blog. He writes: “Apple boss Tim Cook has today hit back at the FBI over a court order issued to help the US agency unlock the iPhone of San Bernardino killer Syed Rizwan Farook. Farook, along with his wife Tashfeen Malik, killed 14 people in the attack in December last year.

“Mr Cook had previously defended the company’s refusal to comply with the FBI’s order that it remove security blocks on Farook’s device so data on it could be accessed and help the FBI in its investigations.

“He said the FBI was asking the company to make “the software equivalent of cancer”; as it would effectively open a back door into the iOS operating system that could threaten users’ privacy, put consumers at risk of cyber fraud, and invite covert monitoring by government or law enforcement agencies.

“And in an irony perhaps not lost on Apple, opening up the iOS operating system could actually benefit those same criminals or terrorists keen to exploit these holes, or seeking ways to cover their tracks.

“The protection of people’s data is incredibly important. And so the trade-off here is we know that doing this could expose people to incredible vulnerabilities” Mr Cook told ABC.

“When asked if he was concerned that Apple may hinder investigations that could prevent a future attack, Mr Cook said: “Some things are hard and some things are right. And some things are both. This is one of those things.”

“However….

“While Tim Cook fears our exposure to “incredible vulnerabilities”, I cannot help think that we are at far greater vulnerability to the type of globalised, highly-organised and ruthless terrorist activity that Farook potentially represents.

“With the horrific memories of Bataclan still fresh, is Silicon Valley going to take the risk that a refusal to allow the authorities into a terrorist’s phone may result in another heinous, terrorist incident with the loss of many lives?

“As I have said before, those with nothing to hide should have nothing to worry about. The so-called Snoopers’ Charter presents no threat to those without criminal intent.

“The suggestion that allowing the FBI into a terrorist’s smartphone is a mortal attack on our civil liberties misses the point. The real point is that there are too many real mortal attacks that are taking real lives at the moment”.

Corps Security Website

Opinions expressed by contributors and commentators do not necessarily reflect the views of Infologue.com or Interconnective Limited.


Leave a Reply

*
Interconnective Security Products