Paul Housego – Changes to Tupe

Bob Forsyth – The Key battleground for client data Bob Forsyth, Chief Executive Officer at Kings Security, discusses new disruptive technologies and their impact on the today's marketplace in his latest blog. Read on »
UK OSPAs winners announced The UK Outstanding Security Performance Awards (OSPAs) event took place at the Royal Lancaster in central London on 1 March. Over 400 security professionals gathered to celebrate Read on »
James G Brown shortlisted for the 2018 UK OSPAs Lifetime Achievement Award James (Jim) G Brown, Chairman and Founder of Selectamark Security Systems, has been shortlisted for this year's OSPA Lifetime Achievement Award. Read on »
Thursday, 22 March 2018

Paul Housego – Changes to Tupe

Paul Housego - Labour Lawyer of Beers Solicitors

Paul Housego - Labour Lawyer of Beers Solicitors

Paul Housego, Labour Lawyer of Beers Solicitors writes about recent court decisions in regards to Tupe. Paul writes: “Tupe cases keep coming. The 2006 tupe regs brought in the concept of a “service provision change” (spc). There doesn’t need to be an economic entity which transfers and retains its identity if there is a change of service provider. Security and facilities management are classic services to which this definition applies. It is an spc to outsource, insource or transfer a contract to another contractor.

So far so good. But what if a building changes ownership, and the new owner doesn’t want the previous owner’s security firm or cleaners? You might think that as it was the same building and the same job being done, just for someone else, it is an spc.

Not so, the Employment Appeal Tribunal says in Taurus Group Ltd -v- Crofts and Securitas Security Services (UK) Ltd. This follows another case (Hunter -v- McCarrick) decided earlier this year, which had more complicated facts as an insolvency was involved and the employee had worked for the new owner for a while. The Taurus case makes it clear that it is only an spc if it is the same client. If the client changes, the new one doesn’t inherit all the service providers.

This is really quite important, because it means that tupe may not apply to subcontractors when a business is sold. But watch this space – the Hunter case is going to the Court of Appeal later this year.”

Beers LLP Website

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Interconnective Security Products