SIA – Unlicensed door supervisor given suspended sentence

 
Churchill Services Group announces the launch of its new rebranded security division Churchill Services Group has today announced the launch of its new rebranded security division – ‘Amulet’. Read on »
Bob Forsyth – GDPR (Sorry don’t fall asleep it’s important) In his latest blog for Infologue Bob Forsyth, Chief Executive Officer at Kings Security writes about the introduction of GDPR and its implications for the security sector. Read on »
Business leader wants “social value” overhaul of government contracts Public sector contracts should no longer be given to the lowest bidder but awarded to “social business” says Phillip Ullmann of Cordant Group. Read on »
Monday, 18 June 2018

SIA – Unlicensed door supervisor given suspended sentence

Security Industry Authority

A door supervisor who continued to work despite having his Security Industry Authority licence revoked has been given a suspended sentence.

John Brown, of Coach Lane, Newcastle, was convicted in July 2013 of causing actual bodily harm. Following the conviction the SIA revoked his Door Supervisor Licence to remove him from working in the private security industry.

Despite this Brown, 49, continued to work unlicensed at a city centre bar in Newcastle.

On Friday [11 April], at Newcastle Crown Court, John Brown was found guilty for working as an unlicensed security operative contrary to section 3 of the Private Security Industry Act 2001.

Brown was sentenced to three months imprisonment, suspended for 12 months and ordered to carry out 100 hours of unpaid work. He was also fined £250 for a breach of the previous suspended sentence and ordered to pay costs of £250.

Proceeding against the security company that deployed him is currently being taken forward by the SIA.

In sentencing Brown, Judge Brian Forster QC stated: “Parliament endorsed a system which affords protection to those needing to use security services, and the public. Anyone working without a licence commits a serious offence. It is right that such an offence is punishable by imprisonment. This was a blatant offence.”

Head of Investigation Nathan Salmon said: “The regulation of the private security industry was set up to protect the public from individuals such as Mr Brown. Despite being barred from the industry for a serious violent offence, his employer showed, at best, blatant disregard for any guidance on vetting and checking staff.”

SIA Website


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Interconnective Security Products